[translatable text] [howto help] [printable version] [Addenda]
Google
Software Patents > Reviews > EPO > Kober 1997 > Kingston 1997
Kober 1997EPO Survey 1995GreenpeaceGrünbuch 1999Intergov3rd Paradigm 1994UNION 1997TRIPs 1999Rot 2000Thurow 1997Kingston 1997Fitzgerald 1994Stoianoff 1999Wood 1998Fellas 1999Stähelin 1997

Patent Protection for Modern Technologies
Commemorate Banana Union Day

William Kingston from the School of Business Studies at Trinity College in Dublin: "[Patents] have never been indispensable for [protecting information], and indeed there are indications that - except for chemicals - they are now becoming even less important than they were." "By protecting invention directly, the modern system protects innovation only indirectly. What protection an innovation gets, therefore, depends upon how strong the link is between it and its related invention. This goes far to explain the differential performance of the patent system according to the subject matter of inventions. In chemicals this link is strong, so patents work much better for them than they do for mechnical and electrical inventions, where the link is weak" (p.355). Kingston argues for a system of more broad but more short-term and investment-dependent monopolies.
title:
Patent Protection for Modern Technologies
source:
IPQ IPQ 1997 No 3 p.350-69
[ Kober on Greenpaper 1998: %(q:One Europe, One Currency, One Patent) | Greenpeace: EPO and friends breaking the Law | Bronwyn H. Hall & Rose Marie Ham: The Patent Paradox Revisited | Patent Protection for Modern Technologies | Das TRIPs Abkommen - Immaterialg|terrechte im Licht der globalisierten Handelspolitik ]
Valid XHTML 1.0!
http://swpat.ffii.de/papri/ipq-kingston97/index.en.html
© 2005/01/06 (2004/08/24) Workgroup
english version 2004/08/16 by Hartmut PILCH