[EN English] [DE Deutsch] [FR Francais] [NL Nederlands] [translatable text] [howto help] [Addenda]

Google
JURIRejectPurposeMonitoringHarmonisation

Rigetto della Direttiva
Giornata dell'Unione Bananaria

Visto il rifiuto della Commissione e del Consiglio di svolgere i propri compiti e i dubbi sulla legalità della "Posizione Comune" del 7 Marzo, il Parlamento ha ampie ragioni per rigettare completamente il progetto di direttiva. Molti Parlamentari Europei hanno sottomesso emendamenti che chiedono ciò, con maggiori o minori giustificazioni.
  1. Lista di Voto
  2. Emendamenti in dettaglio
num.sottoposto davotocritique
40Stroz+ The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.
41Lichtenberger+ The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.

Amendment 40 rejette la position commune

sottoposto da:
Daniel Stroz
lingua:
Francese
argomento:
Rigetto della Direttiva
raccomandazione:
+
amendment
  
justification
En proposant la brevetabilité des inventions mises en oeuvre par ordinateur, la Commission ouvre la voie à la brevetabilité du savoir humain. De plus, cette directive ne répond pas aux enjeux économiques, scientifiques et culturels du secteur du logiciel ainsi qu'à la nécessité de promouvoir l'innovation. Pour toutes ces raisons et pour répondre à la forte opposition de scientifiques, d'éditeurs de logiciels, la position commune doit être rejetée

Critiche

The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.

Amendment 41 Rejects the Common Position

sottoposto da:
Evelin Lichtenberger, Monica Frassoni
misura:
par 1
lingua:
Inglese
argomento:
Rigetto della Direttiva
raccomandazione:
+
amendment
  
justification
The Common Position was questioned by several Member states in the Council, even when the political agreement was finally adopted earlier this year. This means that there are strong doubts about the content of the Common Position.

Critiche

The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.
[ 2005-05-04 JURI Emendamenti alla Direttiva sui Brevetti Software > Reject | Purpose | Monitoring | Harmonisation ]
XHTML 1.0 valido!
http://swpat.ffii.org/papri/europarl0309/amends05/juri0504/rejekt.it.html
© 2005-06-17 Hartmut PILCH
versione italiana 2005-06-17 di Simo SORCE