Reject the Directive

no.	submitted by	vote	critique
40	Stroz	+	The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.
41	Lichtenberger	+	The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.

Amendment 40 rejette la position commune

submitted by:

Daniel Stroz

language:

French

topic:

Reject the Directive

recommendation:

+

amendment
justification
En proposant la brevetabilité des inventions mises en oeuvre par ordinateur, la Commission ouvre la voie à la brevetabilité du savoir humain. De plus, cette directive ne répond pas aux enjeux économiques, scientifiques et culturels du secteur du logiciel ainsi qu'à la nécessité de promouvoir l'innovation. Pour toutes ces raisons et pour répondre à la forte opposition de scientifiques, d'éditeurs de logiciels, la position commune doit être rejetée

Critique

The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.

Amendment 41 Rejects the Common Position

submitted by:

Evelin Lichtenberger, Monica Frassoni

provision:

par 1

language:

English

topic:

Reject the Directive

recommendation:

+

amendment
justification
The Common Position was questioned by several Member states in the Council, even when the political agreement was finally adopted earlier this year. This means that there are strong doubts about the content of the Common Position.

Critique

The Council has in multiple ways failed to present the Parliament with a workable basis for a second reading. For the sake of the sanity of the legislative process, the Parliament should say No.