[translatable text] [howto help] [printable version] [Readers' Comments]
DGMarkt Consultation 2000PbT ConsultantsGünther SchölchBrian KahinEuroLinuxGI e.V.

CEC Software Patent Consultation 2000 Submissions: Erwin Basinsky

patent attorney from San Francisco explains that software must be patentable because it is no different from hardware, because of TRIPS and because patents allow small software companies access venture capital more easily, and because Europe needs access to more venture capital. The opensource won't be harmed, because the corporate world is not interested in harming it. Assertions about bad macro-economic efficiency of patents are academic and speculative.

author:
Erwin Basinsky
Date of Submission:
2000
files:
basinsky.pdf and local copy



[ European Consultation on the Patentability of Computer-Implementable Rules of Organisation and Calculation (= Programs for Computers) | PbT Consultants 2001: Summary Report on EU Software Patentability Consultation | Günter Schölch: Comments on the Consultation Paper | CEC Software Patent Consultation 2000 Submissions: Erwin Basinsky | Eurolinux Alliance 2000-12: Submission to the EC Consultation on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Rules of Organisation and Calculation (Programs for Computers) | German Informatics Corporatists worried about Systematics of Patent Law: GI Position Paper on Patentability of Computer Implementable Rules of Organisation and Calculation ]

http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eukonsult00/basinsky/index.en.html
© 2003/09/18 (2000/20/00) Workgroup