#rtP: 30 Computer Scientists 2003/05: Petition against Software Patent Directive #Wac: explain why this directive is economically unjustifiable and ethically scandalous #iEr: Petition to the European Parliament #ift: From 1997, the European Patent Office has initiated and generalised the granting of patents for algorithms, software ideas, data structures and information processing methods. In a directive proposal on 20 February 2002, the European Commission proposed to officialise this abuse, presenting it as a status quo. In fact, this is a considerable extension of scope of patentability, in breach of the spirit of the European Patent Convention that excludes from patentability mathematical methods, computer programs and presentations of information. #WWa: The signatories are scientists and software innovators, each of which has contributed at his level to the extraordinary development of information technology. We draw the attention of the Members of the European Parliament to the danger that would arise from accepting the text proposed by the Commission as it stands. Acceptance of patentability of algorithms, of principles of software, of information processing methods or of data structures is scandalous from the view point of ethics, economically unjustified and harmful, would impact adversely scientific and technical innovation, and puts democracy at danger. #wdd: It is ethically scandalous, because in today's world, knowledge, information and ideas can not be separated from their technical representations and the software that manipulate them. It would allow patent offices to further develop the giant auctioning of the domain of ideas and knowledge, when this domain was always considered as a precious common good, that can not be turned in anyone's property. #laW: It is economically unjustified, because the very arguments that have been used to justify patents for mechanical and chemical industries, or more generally manufacturing, do not apply in anyway to software. No need for software of those monopolies without which one could hesitate to build a production plant. Manufacturing can very well continue to patent their technical devices, whether or not they include software components, as have done for decades. But this protection must not be extended to software. Copyright protection for software has allowed the development of huge industries, without any need for patents. They would be not only useless, but also extremely harmful, because they would cast in concrete the so powerful oligopolies that naturally emerge in information-based industries, when we need on the contrary new instruments to create more competition. #cja: In the field of software and information, scientific and technical innovation needs the open exchange of ideas and knowledge more than anything, in contrast to the land grab of ideas. Patents would institute a giant tax on innovation, feeding a system out of control, servant of established positions. #hcf: It puts democracy at danger, since the tools of public expression, of debate, of media, of public consultation are critically dependent on software. How can one imagine to create private monopoly statute for this essential basis of tomorrow's democracy ? #ipo: Patent offices and some technocrats of intellectual property have demonstrated an imagination without limits in order to justify the auctioning of what belongs to the public against the spirit of their charter. We urge the Members of the European Parliament, whatever their party affiliation, to adopt a text that will make impossible, clearly, for today and tomorrow, any patenting of the underlying ideas of software (or algorithms), of information processing methods, of representations of information and data, and of software interaction between human beings and computers. # Local Variables: ; # coding: utf-8 ; # srcfile: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/phm/sys/mlht.el ; # mailto: mlhtimport@ffii.org ; # login: phm ; # passwd: YYYYY ; # feature: swpatdir ; # dok: komp0305 ; # txtlang: en ; # multlin: t ; # End: ;