[FR Francais] [DE Deutsch] [translatable text] [howto help] [printable version] [Addenda]
Google
Bessen & H 2003/05Bessen & M 2000Somaya & T 2000Waterson & I 1998Hall & H 1999Kortum & L 1998

Bessen & Maskin 2000: Sequential Innovation
Commemorate Banana Union Day

This article is written by two researcher from MIT and concludes, after giving mathematical models and experimental evidence, that in a dynamic world such as the software industry or consulting industry, firms may have plenty of incentive to innovate without patents and patents may constrict complementary innovation. It concludes that copyright protection for software programs (which has gone through its own evolution over the last decade) may have achieved a better balance than patent protection. This new model suggests another, different rationale for narrow patent breadth than the recent economic literature on this subject.
title:
Bessen & Maskin 2000: Sequential Innovation
source:
http://www.researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf
some of the most innovative industries today -- software, computers and semiconductors -- have historically had weak patent protection and have experienced rapid imitation of their products.

Far from unleashing a flurry of new innovative activity, these stronger property rights ushered in a period of stagnant, if not declining, R&D among those industries and firms that patented most.

[ Bessen & Hunt 2003/05: An Empirical Look at Software Patents → Bessen & Maskin 2000: Sequential Innovation | Deepak Somaya & David J. Teece 2000-11-30: Combining Inventions in Multi-invention Products: Organizational Choices, Patents, and Public Policy | Waterson & Ireland: An Auction Model of Intellectual Property Protection: Patent vs Copyright | Bronwyn H. Hall & Rose Marie Ham: The Patent Paradox Revisited | Kortum & Lerner 1998: What is behind the recent surge in patenting ]
Valid XHTML 1.0!
http://swpat.ffii.de/papri/bessenmaskin00/index.en.html
© 2005/01/06 (2004/08/24) Workgroup
english version 2004/08/16 by Hartmut PILCH